ASTM D2166 PDF

This standard is issued under the fixed designation D/DM; the 1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D18 on Soil and. GeoTesting Express is a provider of Soil Testing Services – ASTM D, Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. Page 1. ASTM D Unconfined Compressive Strength. Page 2. Page 3.

Author: Kazrajind Nikonos
Country: Albania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 2 August 2008
Pages: 136
PDF File Size: 9.15 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.29 Mb
ISBN: 444-8-50858-997-1
Downloads: 83090
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Torr

Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. Active view current version of standard. Link to Active This link will always astn to the current Active version of the standard. It is beyond the scope of this test method to consider significant digits used in analysis methods for engineering design.

ASTM D / DM – 16 Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil

Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. Dry and crumbly soils, fissured or varved materials, silts, peats, and sands cannot be tested with this method to obtain valid unconfined compression strength values. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard.

Active Risk Management

Asgm determination of the unconsolidated, undrained strength of cohesive soils with lateral confinement is covered by Test Method D Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version s2166 the standard. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to commensurate with these considerations.

Dry and crumbly soils, fissured or varved materials, silts, peats, and sands cannot be tested with this method to obtain valid unconfined compression strength values.

  GANGRENA DE FOUNIER PDF

It is beyond the scope of this test method to consider xstm digits used in analysis methods for engineering design. This implicitly combines two separate systems of units; that is, the absolute system and the gravitational system.

The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to commensurate with these considerations.

In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that should generally be retained. Dry and crumbly soils, fissured or varved materials, silts, peats, and sands cannot be tested with this method to obtain valid unconfined compression strength values.

Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. The values stated in inch-pound units are approximate. This implicitly combines two separate systems of units; that is, the absolute system and the gravitational system.

Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D does astn in itself ensure reliable results. Note The determination of the unconsolidated, undrained strength of cohesive soils with lateral confinement is covered by Test Method D The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other.

ASTM D / DM – 13 Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil

For asgm that will not retain a stable shape, a vane shear test or Test Method D can be used to determine sensitivity. It is scientifically undesirable to combine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a single standard. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.

It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and astk practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to commensurate with these considerations.

  KURAN NA MAKEDONSKI PDF

Active view current version c2166 standard.

It is scientifically undesirable to combine the use of two separate sets of inch-pound units within a single standard. Also, unsaturated soils will usually exhibit different shear strengths when tested in accordance with Test Method D Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.

In this system, the pound lbf represents a unit of force weightwhile the unit for mass is slugs. The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used.

This method of determining sensitivity is suitable only for soils that can retain a stable specimen shape in the remolded state. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D provides a means of evaluating some of those factors.

Note 1 — The determination of the unconsolidated, undrained strength of cohesive soils with lateral confinement is covered by Test Method D In this system, the pound lbf represents a unit of force weightwhile the asstm for mass is slugs. It is beyond the scope of this test method to consider significant digits s2166 in analysis methods for engineering design.

In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that should generally be retained. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that should generally be retained.

Author: admin