The Baloney Detection Kit: A Point Checklist for Science Literacy and Skeptic Magazine editor Michael Shermer — a point checklist for. Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine lays out a “Baloney Detection Kit,” ten questions we should ask when encountering a claim. Baloney Detection. How to draw boundaries between science and pseudoscience. By MICHAEL SHERMER. When lecturing on science and pseudoscience at.
|Country:||Trinidad & Tobago|
|Published (Last):||14 February 2010|
|PDF File Size:||14.68 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.33 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A world of information. In this interesting video, which in my opinion should be required watching for everyone at least several times in their lifetimes, Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine provides us with a “Baloney Detection Kit” — ten questions we should ask when encountering any claim. Is the claimant playing by the rules of science? Interestingly, these ten questions look remarkably like what science isbut take a look for yourself and tell me what you think:.
Jump to content [s] Jump to comments [c] Jump to site navigation  Jump to search  Terms and conditions . Does this fit with the way the world works? Turn autoplay off Turn autoplay on.
Baloney Detection Kit | GrrlScientist | Science |
Only after many tests of the same hypothesis conducted by lots of different people around the world have been unable to disprove that hypothesis, is it accepted as a theory. It always surprises me to realise how many people have a completely alien idea of what science actually is. All of these things provide information.
Basically, science is a process that looks like this; observing a particular phenomenon carefully thinking critically about those observations formulating a hypothesis to explain those observations making predictions to test that hypothesis testing those hypotheses and observing what happens revising the hypothesis to fit the resulting data observations obtained from previous tests of that hypothesis Only after many tests of the same hypothesis conducted by lots of different people around the world have been unable to disprove that hypothesis, is it accepted as a theory.
Does the source make similar claims? Okay, true, science also depends upon a fair amount of obsession as well.
Has anyone tried to disprove the claim? How reliable is the source of the claim? Have the claims been verified by somebody else? Are personal beliefs driving the claim? We have switched baloey comments on this old version of the site.
To comment on crosswords, please switch over to the new version to comment.
Baloney Detection Kit
Does the new theory account for as many phenomena as the old theory? Here’s an informative and well-done sehrmer that presents these points: Unlike what many people think, science is not all about expensive equipment, it’s all about the critical thinking that underlies all that stuff, it’s the bloney about the world that are inspired by simply looking around and wondering why things are the way they are but read this commentary by Nobel Prize winner, Sir Peter Medawar [ free PDF ] and read this discussion.
News Science Science and scepticism. Is the claimant providing positive evidence? Baloney Detection Kit With all this information coming at us from all directions, how can we tell what’s true?
Baloney Detection Kit
Basically, science is a process that looks like this. Where does the preponderance of evidence point?
With all this information bombarding us from all directions, how do we discern which claims are misinformation, which are bogus, and which are true? Interestingly, these ten questions look remarkably like what science isbut take a look for yourself and tell me what you think: