But Blumenberg’s book makes all the things that Heidegger made . His attempt to legitimate the modern age is an attempt to defend all the. ity and modernism, that the English translation of Hans Blumenberg’s The. Legitimacy of the Modern Age comes as an especially welcome event.3 For al-. which launched the Lowith-Blumenberg debate over the nature of secularization and the legitimacy of the modern age. ‘ The widespread discussion the book.
|Published (Last):||18 August 2010|
|PDF File Size:||8.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.83 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
To rebel against God is not to escape religion.
Hans Blumenberg: The Legitimacy of the Modern Age
In agreement with Denis Trierweiler we believe that this confrontation is crucial. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, 3, trans. Liberal political theology is therefore caught in a stranglehold. The most immediately striking arguments are methodological in nature: Alberto Fragio – – Logos. Is modernity, in the words of Nietzsche, a high or a low civilization?
The latter begins in the first legitimacg and continues in the books that follow, with an analysis of the notions of Gnosticism, intellectual curiosity, and epochal threshold. In this major work, Blumenberg agf issue with Karl Lowith’s well-known thesis that the idea of progress is a secularized version of Christian eschatology, which promises a dramatic intervention that will consummate the history of the But the latter book waited only six years to be translated into English. From this point of view, modernity does indeed constitute an escape from the theological, and not a transformation blkmenberg the theological into a form of mundane theology.
Curiosity Is Enrolled in the Catalog of Vices. He thus helps us see that the demand to unmask completely, to make all things new, to start from nowhere, to substitute new true consciousness for old false consciousness, is itself an echo of the Enlightenment.
Now will you blumengerg give me the questions to my answers! This self-understanding is in a sense the very truth of the phenomenon: However, in reality, blumenbeerg values were not posited as absolutes by modernity itself.
Modernity as Secularized Theology Another example of a misinterpreted act of modernity is that of the modern state conceived as a secularization of the divine omnipotence. It has often been said that postmodernity inaugurated a more distant and ironic relationship with regard to the values of modernity. But this rejection leaves theoretical curiosity without excuse.
Legitimacy of the Modern Age?: Hans Blumenberg and Carl Schmitt – Oxford Handbooks
Kirk Wetters – – Telos: The fact that Blumenberg undertakes a defense of modernity does not of course mean that he is seeking to justify the totalitarian domination of technical rationality over being, nor the religion of progress and the mundane eschatologies which accompany them, nor still the philosophy of subjectivity and the resultant solipsistic confinement of Mankind—to take some of the principal criticisms leveled at modernity since the s.
Instead, Blumenberg argues,the idea of progress always implies a process at work within history, operating through an internallogic that ultimately expresses human choices and is legitimized by human self-assertion, by man’sresponsibility for his own fate.
This borrowing also creates a debt in its turn, even if that debt is more often than not difficult to express in normative terms: However—and this is the crux of the matter—atheism itself is not an escape route from theology.
It is legitimate due to the necessity which is born out of the impasse caused by the late medieval crisis, and by the failure of theology to answer the question which it itself had posed. Others gesture in the direction of a monastery in Ladakh, or a commune in Oregon. It is to the credit of such post-Heideggerian philosophers as Derrida and Foucault that they avoid this insistence on the belatedness of the modern age.
His hermeneutic, on the contrary, is centered upon the self-understanding which an era constructs for itself out of its own situation within history—this is, moreover, a hermeneutic bias which he shares with Voegelin to a certain extent.
I got this as an ex library book. The only real choice is that between an orthodox, coherent political theology capable of accepting itself as such and a heterodox, contradictory, and latent political theology. It is not what it claims to be, namely an escape from religion and the liberation mosern mankind—it is in truth no more than the continuation of religion by new means.
If you have purchased a print nodern that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code. These answers consisted in variations on the claim that the point of our lives lies in our contribution to an infinite task — the acquisition of Baconian knowledge-as-power, the satisfaction of theoretical curiosity — which lies before the species as a whole.
Publications Pages Publications Pages. On the contrary, there is a moral earnestness about the book which is extremely impressive. This makes it a slow book to read, for one constantly has to chew over novel interpretations of familiar texts.
The legitimacy of our modern consciousness is simply that it is the best way we have so far found to give sense to our lives.
Modernity does not constitute an epoch, since it generates no new values. The History of Psychological Categories.