Introduction-to-antiphilosophyst. Introduction-to- antiphilosophyst. Introduction to Antiphilosophy. by Boris Groys. Introduction to Antiphilosophy has 45 ratings and 0 reviews. Philosophy is traditionally understood as the search for universal truths, and philosophers. Introduction to Antiphilosophy by Boris Groys, Global Distinguished Professor of Russian and Slavic Studies at New York University, and also a Professor of.
|Published (Last):||21 August 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.75 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Introduction to Antiphilosophy by Boris Groys – review
The fact is that the word ‘introduction’ carries with it too many pedagogical associations, and Groys’ extremely interesting research should be taken more as a prolegomena for any discussion of anti-philosophy in more recognizable terms. One place where Introduction to Antiphilosophy does engage with a first principle of anti-philosophy is in relation to the borks status of philosophy nihilism.
Rainer rated it really liked it Jan 20, Introduction to Antiphilosophy by Boris Groys. For both philosophy and art, this is a democratizing project: B oris Groys, who has the trepidation-inducing title of Global Distinguished Professor of Russian and Slavic Studies at New York University, is the author of The Total Art of Stalinisma provocative essay in which antiphilisophy argues that the avant garde desire to transform the groyss of reality, to make life itself into a unitary art work, found a form of twisted completion in Stalinism.
Perhaps this is not so incredible after all. The authors I treat in this book can be understood as a ready-made philosophers, by analogy with the ready-made artists. After having written so antiphiilosophy on the persistence of the totalitarian and the theological, Groys sees the internet as somehow free from these. Nicholas Gledhill rated it it was amazing Nov 20, Groys never discusses Adorno, a striking omission in light of his temper and range: Hardcoverpages.
Aaron rated it it was amazing Jan 26, Boris Efimovich Groys born 19 March is an art critic, media theorist, and philosopher. He also backdates some of these ideas to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing’s concerns about the relationship between text, image booris mediality, comparing them with both McLuhan’s and Greenberg’s views on the medium as message, or the image as text and the text as ‘readymade’ p.
When readers have a pocket-sized book on these ideas, they will be delighted by Groys. Michael Eby rated it it was amazing May 22, Paulvn rated it it was amazing Dec 13, Open Preview See a Problem?
Benjamin Kunkel reviews ‘Introduction to Antiphilosophy’ by Boris Groys · LRB 8 August
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Lists with This Book. Refresh and try again. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Philosophy is traditionally understood as the search for universal truths, and philosophers are supposed to transmit those truths beyond the limits of their own culture. As a consequence, the theme of anti-philosophy receives no explicit mention in the majority of the essays, though this is not to say sntiphilosophy it is not touched upon, at least tangentially, throughout the volume.
The differences go further. An antiphilosopher is like a contemporary art curator: If you close only one eye, the image could as easily be product upon product lavished on the feet of Capital.
Just don’t think about it
The ordinary becomes special, or rather, there is now nothing exceptional about philosophy and its objects: But the sting is the end of the essay. Lera Auerbach rated it it was amazing Feb 05, That said, one suspects that Groys is actually rather skeptical of the whole enterprise, and especially with regard to some of the more contemporary forms of anti-philosophy that he dubs ‘postmodern’. Anti-philosophy, for him, begins with Marx and Kierkegaard, and does not operate with criticism but rather with command.
The latter presents Benjamin as a theologian of a vanishing past where only popular cultural reproduction is thereby possiblerather than as a philosopher of a now impossible future enlightenment for the exceptional few these opposed temporal orientations capturing the essences of the respective disciplines: The other essays of particular interest to philosophers of a standard hue are on Derrida and Benjamin.
Vassilchik rated it it was amazing Jul 28, Although I would recommend it to anyone already interested in critical theory and the avant garde, it is not quite the book I thought it was. Dusty rated it liked it Sep 13, Hilary rated it it was amazing Jul 29, Karl rated it it was amazing Sep 28, In Introduction t Philosophy is traditionally understood as the search for universal truths, and philosophers are supposed to transmit those truths beyond the limits of their own culture.
When it does examine the major figures of philosophy, its investigations belong exclusively to the ‘continental’ side — Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Derrida. Be the first to ask a question about Introduction to Antiphilosophy.
Introduction to Antiphilosophy | Mute
Where we perceive a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage upon wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet”. Adorno is worth keeping in mind while reading Boris Groys, who is one of the more interesting philosophical — he would say antiphilosophical — writers on art today. There are other joys in this book — Groys’s essay on Gotthold Ephraim Lessing and the unspeaking nature of art brings to this reader’s stark attention a linguistic irony: Or as Heidegger said so often, Die Sprache spricht — “Language speaks” being the inadequate translation.
Introduction to Antiphilosophy discusses a dozen or so thinkers — most of them Western European, most of them unsystematic — since Kierkegaard. His face is turned toward the past. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Malthe rated it really liked it Jun 08, Whereas the modernist says that the end of philosophy has already occurred at some point in the past and whatever appears to be happening now is only pure repetition, the postmodernist argues that the end of philosophy is either about to occur at some future point or is only now occurring in the event of his or her own enunciation.