Harold W. Hoehner Daniel B. Wallace. Harold Hoehner, Distinguished Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas. Theological Seminary. Since its introduction in the early nineteen-seventies Harold Hoehner’s Chronological Aspects of the Life of Christ (Dallas Theological Seminary , Harold W. Hoehner, PhD, ThD () Legacy Professor. Education: Cambridge University, PhD; Dallas Theological Seminary, ThM and ThD; Barrington.
|Published (Last):||8 June 2016|
|PDF File Size:||10.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hoehner postulates a Nisan 1 date occurring on March 5, BC. Finding the difference between the Julian Day numbers of these two dates, we discover that the difference between them is actuallydays, notIt never has occurred in the fall. Book ratings by Goodreads. Saturday March 28, A. Additionally, many Jews and Jewish historians would immediately notice that his proposed date for Nisan 1 in BC is a month too early.
His “magnum opus”,  Ephesians: Howard Marshall, University of Aberdeen “This is quite simply the most massive and meticulously detailed commentary on Ephesians to date–with the strongest defense of the case that the author was truly Paul and that the letter was indeed written to Ephesus.
Other editions – View all Ephesians: In that system, agricultural pursuits hofhner to be put on hold yoehner seventh year. Correct Chronology of the Passion Week:. He interacts extensively with the latest scholarship and provides a fair and thorough discussion of every disputed point in the book.
Next, one needs to establish the beginning hoegner Artaxerxes’ rule. Of course, April 23, A. Thus, there is no possible way to make Hoehner’s calculations align with actual sabbatical cycles.
Ephesians : An Exegetical Commentary
Hoehner Baker Academic- Religion – pages 7 Reviews https: Nehemiah was following what was used by the kings of Judah earlier in their history. Journal for the Study of the New Testament. But the difficulty we will consider in this section disqualifies Hoehner’s view from further consideration.
Starting from Nisan 1, B.
Interpreting the New Testament Text: The needed corrections have been provided by Dr. Required by the events of Friday and Sunday.
In previous chapters in this book it was concluded that Christ’s crucifixion occurred on Friday, Nisan 14, in A. From its stout defense of the Pauline authorship of Ephesians to the detailed, verse-by-verse exegesis of the Greek text, Hoehner’s commentary is a tour de force.
The problems we have discussed regarding Sir Robert Anderson’s dates for the first 69 weeks of Daniel’s 70 weeks are by horhner means unknown to dispensational scholars. Hoehner then delves hoeehner the text of Ephesians verse by verse, offering the Greek text, English translation, and detailed commentary. We first provide a summary of Hoehner’s hohener views on the subject, taken from Ice’s discussion of them at http: When calculated this way the result is precisely the number of days between Nisan 1, B.
Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary – Harold W. Hoehner – Google Books
Dubberstein, Babylonian Chronology B. April 28 could have been Nisan 10 in 33 AD if weather conditions had been perfect the evening of April The prophetic data is given in integers. The Complete Guide to Bible Translations: Because the papyri were dated in both the Jewish calendar and the Egyptian calendar, and because those double dates can only coincide in particular years and particular months, it is possible to assign definite dates to these documents to within a day.
Therefore, Daniel’s reference to 70 years of desolation in Daniel 9: Most thorough commentary I’ve ever read. His father Xerxes died shortly after December 17, B. Thus, using today’s too-early Jewish calendar projected back to BC, we end up with a date for Nisan 1 a whole month later than the date postulated by Hoehner.
It therefore behooves us, if at all possible, to make our calculations of Daniel’s 70 weeks align with actual sabbatical cycles. Conclusion To date, no one has been able to answer the work done by Dr.
Even so, it never starts Nisan 1 on February The start-date of March 5 B.
Ephesians : Harold W. Hoehner :
Hoehner joined the faculty of Dallas Theological Seminary in as an instructor, becoming an assistant professor there the same year. Campbell Chuck Swindoll Mark Bailey. March 5 that year corresponds to a Gregorian date of February Ice is one of the foremost scholars and apologists promoting John Darby’s doctrine of a pre-trib secret hoener.
He is the author of Chronological Aspects of the Life of Christ. Thomas Ice has in the last few years published a repudiation of Anderson’s dates and endorsed Hoehner’s improvements. If conditions were perfect on the evening of April 18, 33 AD, the crescent could have been seen and Nisan could have commenced on April 19, making Tuesday, April 28 indeed Hatold Such years must on average be Since getting the book, I’ve found much of his ahrold material richly Thus in computing the solution we are allowed to distinguish between constants which may be decimal numbers and data which is only given to a particular level of specificity—in this case integers.