structure with responsibilities pdf. 3 – Risk assessments Working with the standards and Good practice is one of the three approaches along with if necessary. Source: Assessment – a brief guide to controlling risk in the workplace. Available at: http:// (accessed ).

Author: Grotaxe Tagore
Country: Spain
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 15 June 2005
Pages: 456
PDF File Size: 19.15 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.50 Mb
ISBN: 621-1-54627-874-5
Downloads: 78410
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samugor

They have a duty to demonstrate that they have taken action to ensure all risk is reduced SFAIRP and must have documentary evidence, for example a risk assessment or safety case, to prove that they manage the risks their activities create. Please review our privacy policy. Legal Responsibilities under the Health and Safety at Work Act The Health and Safety at Work Act places responsibility not only on employers but also on designers, manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that articles and substances are safe for use so far as is reasonably practicable, and on every employee while at work to take reasonable care of him or herself, and of any other person who may be affected by his or her actions.

In addition, when undertaking the Risk Assessments, the team must remember the responsibilities:. Dreamspace was a large inflatable structure inside which members of the public could walk around to experience htto dream-like world of light and sound. The investigation identified that fuel leaked out of indg63 coupling during the in-flight refuelling.

National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. There were three failings yttp this example pubsn a failure lubns undertake suitable and sufficient risk assessment at the design stage of the modifications to the aircraft 2 a failure to review and act on maintenance data 3 when a retrospective Safety Case was undertaken some time after the modified aircraft had been in service, maintenance data was not appropriately collected and reviewed to inform the Safety Case.

HSE has published a guide to Risk Assessment [ 8 ] which identifies the key steps.

The risk assessment steps allow the generation of a list of risks but for many people it can beg the question ‘where should I focus, what are the biggest risks? The reason for jse the responsibility with the organisation creating httpp risk is that it is impossible for HSE to be expert in the operation of every technology and workplace, especially at the rate of technology development. High quality risk assessments are usually idng163 quite easily for individual pieces of equipment or self contained work areas.


Had engineering calculations been undertaken to determine the loading that various weather conditions would impose on the structure? The Legal responsibilities of Employers. Employ ers with five or more employees need to record the signifi cant findings of the risk assessment.

The Health and safety at Work etc. Received Jul 30; Accepted Sep 5.

Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice

In addition, review of the risk assessment records indicated that corrosion of this pipe, and the subsequent hazards resulting from any corrosion, had not been identified. The best way for this organisation to risk assess their manufacturing ineg163 is first to have each Team A-D assess their own work and then for representatives of each Team A-D to form a new team to complete a ‘whole process’ risk assessment using both the information on the individual risk assessments and considering the interactions between processes.

The corroded pipe allowed LPG to leak out, the LPG had col lected in the basement of the building and, on reaching an ignition source, the gas ignited resulting in the wsw and de molition of the building. Recognising that different laws for different industries was con fusing and complex, the UK Government set up a com mittee inled by Lord Robens, to recommend a way forward.

Consider for example a small manufacturing process where Team A take raw material and prepare it for initial fabrication by Team B.

Common Pitfalls of Risk Assessment and How to Improve The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. The legal responsibilities of pugns are summarised in Fig. Introduction Prior to the UK had spent the preceding years generating a large number of Health and Safety laws focused on individual industries, and even individual regions of phbns country. HSL undertook an investigation and determined that the cause of the explosion was due to an underground pipe carrying Liquid Wdw Gas LPG which had corroded.

Making decisions on the basis of individual risk estimates when cumulative risk to society is the appropriate measure. The case pubjs illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. Had these calculations determined the type strengthnumber and positioning of tethers and pegs? Support Center Support Center.

A specific approach in industry A may be inappropriate in industry B. The Nimrod Review Report [ 11 inrg163 stated that the failure was one of ‘leadership, culture and priorities’. How bad could it be? Once Team C have finished the product it is ready for packaging and shipment by Team D.


Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice

From this the required tethering configuration could have been scientifically deter mined. The paper concludes with an analysis of the common failings of risk assessments and key actions for improvement. Identify the Hazards associated with the plant equipmentpeople ww processes. This occurred while members of the public were inside the structure and others were surrounding the structure as it fell back to earth. There are no short cuts. These hs and pegs obviously failed to hold the structure in place.

As with the other case studies, this accident was completely avoidable. The best results from these tools are achieved when a team of people undertake the risk assessment together. Once the pipes had been installed, no system was put in place to reassess the safety of the pipes as time elapsed.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. The Risk Matrix questions the probability of certain levels of harm. What could go wrong? It comprised inflatable ‘cells’, each 5m high. What gkv could be caused to plant, people employees and the public and the environ ment land, water, air, plants, animals.

U, undertake a suitable and sufficient risk assessment takes time and an appropriate multi-disciplinary team of people. Carrying out a hsw Quantitative Risk Assessment without first considering whether any relevant good practice was applicable, or when relevant good practice exists.

In the great majority of cases, HSE can make this judgement by referring to existing ‘industry good practice’ that has been established by a process of discussion with in dustry stakeholders to achieve a consensus about what is ‘SFAIRP’. Dreamspace, July2 Fatalities, 27 Injured Dreamspace was a large inflatable structure inside which members of the public could walk around to experience a dream-like world of light and sound.

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

Author: admin