“The Intentional Fallacy” was published by W.K. Wimsatt, Jr. and Monroe C. Beardsley in their book The Verbal Icon in It is widely considered a landmark. Intentional Fallacy. William K. Wimsatt Jr. & Monroe C. Beardsley., revised in. The claim of the author’s “intention” upon the critic’s judgement has been chal-. Introduced by W.K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley in The Verbal Icon Intentional fallacy, term used in 20th-century literary criticism to describe the.

Author: Mikat Vijinn
Country: Singapore
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 15 February 2007
Pages: 236
PDF File Size: 16.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.37 Mb
ISBN: 896-6-78846-430-4
Downloads: 39742
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gule

Intentional fallacy

Jeffrey Warndof rated it really liked it May 27, If it achieved its goal? Wimsatt questions the ability of a poem to function aesthetically in the same way as a painting or sculpture. A pastiche of critical opinions is not what critical enquiry means. Let me preface by saying that while I am a stubborn anti-intentionalist, this essay actually challenged my viewpoint somewhat.

Contact our editors with your feedback. Please try again later.

A Critical Summary of intentional fallacy_百度文库

Paul de Man offers a significant critique of Wimsatt’s text, taken as an example of the understanding of the notion of ‘autonomy’ in New Criticism, in Blindness and Insight.

Which doesn’t matter, anyway, according to Wimsatt and Monroe. Summary of Love is a F The unfortunate side effect is that this view strips the artist themselves of all value; it implies that only the product of their creation is of any importance. If it did, than we should find evidence for it in the work itself. Wimsatt also drew on the work of both ancient critics, such as Longinus and Aristotleand some of his own contemporaries, such as T.


Intentional fallacy | literary criticism |

Taste, criticism, and judgment nonfiction criticism In nonfictional prose: In addition to claiming that one should reject the idea of an author’s intention in order to attain an understanding, Wimsatt and Beardsley also affirm that “[t]he poem is not the critic’s own and not the author’s” Grey Nutter rated it liked it Jan 05, As a result, it is less accessible and less valuable.

All we can judge is the latter. Such biographical information doesn’t necessarily entail intentionalism; instead it may clarify the meanings of the words, the nuances of imagery, within the literary text. A summary of Catch Me Postmodernism, in Western philosophy, a late 20th-century movement characterized by broad skepticism,….

Moreover, discovering such sources of literary material in the personal or cultural life of the author provides little or no aid to understanding the meaning of the poem.

If judgment is to be aesthetic, it must concern itself with…. As a staunch formalist critic, Wimsatt believed in the authority of the poem: Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Rather, it becomes the public’s at its birth because it exists for others to examine: By using this site, you agree to fal,acy Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Like internal evidence, this material can also be available for observation. Readers inevitably apply standards distinct from the author’s to the study of literature in order to articulate its truth. Which is slightly weird.

Plus, how could we validate this intent? More About Intentional fallacy 2 references found in Britannica articles role in aesthetics In aesthetics: Although this material may intenrional appeared before “Kubla Khan,” say Wimsatt and Beardsley, this origin “can never be and need not be known in the verbal and hence intellectual composition which is the poem” Art needs to be respected as an autonomous object.

Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley consider fallacies when reading literature. It refers to the error of placing too much emphasis on the effect fallaacy a poem has on its audience when analyzing it.

Author: admin