[Dictatorship versus Democracy]. A Reply to Karl Kautsky. Proofread by Chris Clayton in for the Leon Trotsky Internet Archive. Trotsky. Terrorismo y comunismo: réplica a Karl Kautsky. Front Cover. Leon Trotsky. Akal, Bibliographic information. QR code for Terrorismo y comunismo. Terrorismo y comunismo by Karl Kautsky at – ISBN – ISBN – Júcar. – – Softcover.
|Published (Last):||28 August 2009|
|PDF File Size:||8.8 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Are we really going to be better off with you all in charge though? Trotsky’s ideas form the basis of Trotskyism, a term coined as early as by his opponents in order to separate it from Marxism. Such harsh times would naturally lead to a harsh viewpoint. Listened to as audiobook. He waxed lyrical about how the Revolution “spurred a lazy and demoralised people to incredible feats of arms”. Democracy and free markets are linked so we terdorismo told by Friedmanites and most liberal talking-headsand the kautsjy of capital makes equality and democracy unattainable.
Was Trotsky, then, the secret founder of Stalinism?
Terrorism and Communism: A Reply to Karl Kautsky
Whilst it is easy to opine on what should have happened one hundred years after the event, Trotsky’s beliefs still shock the modern reader. Keynes discusses the possibility of a four hour workday, how about that?
Its when he takes to the ‘positive’ task in the technical sense of defending terrorism and the “dictatorship of the proletariat” that he falls flat on his face.
Not too good, as it turned out. Mar 17, Yogy TheBear rated it did not like it. Trotsky did at least hint of a future terrorsimo the Bolshevik Party when he imagined a Russia where the “concentration of state power in its entirety in the hands of the proletariat would set up for the transitional period of an exceptional regime”. A person who labours entirely in the field of politics, i.
Jun 10, Barbara rated it kautskj liked it. Democracy is not a panacea.
At the very least, I thought this book, written three years after initially taking power, would have some specific details about how communism would work. The democracies at the time were immature. In essence, Trotsky was a violent thug. Yet, nobody can explain, in detail, why the state will improve comunisjo private individuals running businesses and putting the power in the hands of the citizens.
Explore the Home Gift Guide. The book itself doesn’t pierce into that metatheoretical realm – which one could hardly expect every marxist to do.
Terrorism and Communism: A Reply to Karl Kautsky by Leon Trotsky
This became commonplace at the end of the Feudal and Monarchical systems. The idea of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” means crushing all remaining dissent, and Trotsky brags about this! He advocates all sorts of typically “free market” an oxymoron strategies of worker encouragement including work quotas, competition amongst laborers, and one-man-rule over factories.
However, this process, according to Marxist-Lenninst analysis, needs to arc back to a sort of feudal organization with a benign dictatorship in order to catapult back to a classless society.
It does not fix everything. What remains is the morality of the fist; Who can impose his force upon another is good, regardless if he is a capitalist or a proletarian… And lastly the most annoying thing is the endless Kautsky rants. I disagree, but he had a point. It is a dangerous, idealistic vision that can only end up in an out and out dictatorship. Is impossible to seperate their philosophies when it comes to whether or not political violence was justified. Feb 06, David Steece, Jr.
Oct 31, Jordan rated it really liked it Shelves: We need to strive to be as peaceful as possible as a species. What gives the right for either class to rule over the other? For him none have the right logic to talk about the revolution in Russia.
Yet he wanted peace and a more peaceful revolution and transition. Trotsky’s prose from is compelling and he ideas mostly unvarnished. It is of critical importance to understand exactly what this was. In a communist system, there is no incentive to work, so, yes, you will have to force people to work.
Trotsky believed in the opposite, permanent revolution. It was a genuinely frightening concept. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. Aug 05, James rated it really liked it Shelves: May 24, William West rated it it was amazing. Any political philosophy has to be brought about peacefully. I don’t want to give a star review for this, because I read this from a historical perspective, not a “like or dislike”. He said that there was “no other way to socialism” than forcing people to work.
Analogously, the hardships underwent during the s, which western common sense would have the Soviets try to sweep under the rug, are fully recognized and debated. Sadly, for the millions of Russians whose lives were lost, the ship now lies at the bottom of the ocean. Product details Paperback Publisher: Yet, major heavyweight “intellectuals” could not get their brains around it.
I genuinely hope there are no leftists who think this man offered a way forward. Forcing human beings to work? However, Trotsky sneered at this idea.